As in the case of the agreement, some reports may reveal differences of opinion. One of the frequent is CLAIM: in sentence (a), statements instead of protests would indicate that the declaring author does not agree with the censorship of the film. Other verbs like this are ALLEGE and ASSERT (avoid the informal GO GO AROUND SAYING). The derived affirmation, affirmation and affirmation carry the same proposition. Here is a good list of expressions to disagree in English: I hope that all these expressions are useful to give their agreement and disagree. Remember that communication is about interacting with others, so you should really strive to communicate with others accurately and appropriately. Finally, I also recommend using some of these phrases in your writing tasks for B2 and C1, in particular. Verbs that simply form opinion, such as ARGUE, MAINTAIN and THINK (see 107). The language of opinions) may also indicate differences of opinion. This is due to the fact that their highlighting, that the point reported is not a fact, indicates that differences of opinion are possible. The indication can be reinforced by preceding them with Go(s) so far as. (see 191. Exotic grammar structures 3, #4).
Partial expression: z.B. on the one hand.. On the other hand, you are right in a way, but. You may have a point there, but. A quote can be linked to a point indicated, either as before (as X says, …) or afterwards (X says that. – see 127. When indirect language is to be used). I have the impression that there is more agreement. Formal writing expresses consent and disagreement very differently from everyday English, where this type of statement is obviously common. Particular caution is required when refusing in writing, so as not to appear rude.
This contribution presents many common ways of expressing correspondence and disagreement in formal writing. The alternatives to the truth are precisely to be said, to be said convincingly, to say fair, credible (to say), to accept easily, difficult to contradict, obviously, certainly the case and indisputable. The latter two show only a consensus in appropriate contexts: elsewhere, they can only emphasize their user`s faith in the truth of what is said (see 224). Tell the truth of what you say). One of the problems with all of these, of course, is that they require I, which may be inappropriate in formal scriptures (see 46. How to avoid “me”, “we” and “you”). Verbs that allow me to avoid myself are a specific subgroup of those that contribute to the idea of another writer being reported (verbs called “quotations” – see 76th temporal forms of quotation). The example below contains the verb for citation of concordance: The most direct way to express agreement with a verb is with I agree. If the person you agree with has not yet been named, you can mention it below (see 44th troublesome prepositional oblation) and you can mention the point with which you agree: Sometimes when we discuss something in the form of speech or writing, we can agree with certain aspects of what is being discussed, but not necessarily 100%. .