An Areal Typology Of Agreement Systems

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: the information status of the pronoun affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society 101 (2). 235-278. Barlow, Michael. A situated theory of agreement (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland. KljuĆ©ne rijei Accord, sex, linguistic typology, Arealtypology Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Aspects of universal and typological agreement. In Hansjakob Seiler – Franz J Stachowiak (note.M.), Apprehension: The Linguistic Seizure of Objects, Part II: Techniques and Their Context in Individual Languages, 201-267. Tubingen: Narr.

This typological study, measured in more than 300 languages, presents new theoretical knowledge about the nature of concordance, as well as empirical knowledge on the distribution of match patterns in world languages. Koeneman, Olaf and Hedde Zeijlstra. The rich assumption of the agreement has been rehabilitated. Language research 45.571-615. TYPOLOGY BY ACCORD SYSTEMS Prikaz Knjige Ranka – Theoretical and practical approaches to concordance in different languages can be found in the grammatical books of the languages concerned as well as in many scientific and specialized work. Documents that compare the agreement in two related languages. Michael Cysouw. 2011. Very atypical agreement in fact.

Theoretical linguistics 37 (3-4). 153-160. Siewierska, Anna and Dik Bakker. 2005. The agreement on the identification of persons in FG. In Casper de Groot – Kees Hengeveld (Eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in functional grammar (Functional Grammar 27), 203-247. Berlin – New York: Gruyter Sheep. MatasoviĆ©, Ranko. Oral and adnomial agreement: distribution of zones and typological correlations. Language typology 18.

171-214. In some regions with high linguistic diversity, a number of geographical area characteristics have been divided into a number of languages to form a linguistic network (also known as linguistic space, convergence region or diffusion). Some examples are the Balkans, the continental linguistic space of Southeast Asia, and the languages of the Indian subcontinent. [Citation required] Foot, Eric. 2005. The Rise of Concordance: a formal approach to syntax and grammar of verbal difference. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Siewierska, Anna. 1999. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical marker: Why objects do not succeed. Folia Linguistica 33.

225-251. Similarities between two or more languages (whether in typology or vocabulary) may be due to genetic relationships (descent of a common ancestral language), borrowing between languages, maintaining characteristics when a population adopts a new language, or simply by chance. If little or no direct documentation of ancestral languages is available, it can be difficult to determine whether the resemblance is genetic or area. Edward Sapir used contact and dissemination references as a negative tool for genetic reconstruction and did not treat her until the end of his career as a subject in his own right (for example). B for the influence of Tibetan on Tocharian). [1] Agreement is one of the most studied issues in theoretical linguistics.

Comments are closed.